Vardaan Watermark
Vardaan Learning Institute
Created by Team Vardaan with Powered by VARDAAN COMET

Chapter 7: National Movement 1919–1934 (Non-Cooperation & Civil Disobedience Movements)

Chapter Overview

The arrival of Mahatma Gandhi transformed the Indian freedom struggle into a true mass movement based on Satyagraha (truth force) and Ahimsa (non-violence). This period saw two historic nation-wide movements: the Non-Cooperation Movement (1920–1922) and the Civil Disobedience Movement (1930–1934).

1. Causes of the Non-Cooperation Movement

Three Triggers of Non-Cooperation
1. The Rowlatt Act (1919)

Officially called the Anarchical and Revolutionary Crimes Act (March 1919). Empowered the government to arrest any person without warrant and detain them in prison for up to 2 years without trial. Suspects were denied right to legal counsel or appeal. Popularly condemned as "No Vakil, No Dalil, No Appeal" (No Lawyer, No Argument, No Appeal). Gandhi organized a nationwide Rowlatt Satyagraha (hartal on 6 April 1919).

2. Jallianwala Bagh Massacre (13 April 1919)

On Baisakhi day, a peaceful crowd gathered at Jallianwala Bagh in Amritsar to protest the arrest of leaders Dr. Saifuddin Kitchlew and Dr. Satyapal. General Dyer blocked the only exit and ordered troops to open fire on the unarmed crowd without warning. Over 1,000 people were killed. In deep outrage, Rabindranath Tagore surrendered his Knighthood, declaring British rule was devoid of moral justification.

3. The Khilafat Movement (1919–1920)

After WWI, Britain stripped the Sultan of Turkey (the Caliph / Khalifa, spiritual leader of Muslims) of his territories. Led by the Ali Brothers (Maulana Muhammad Ali and Shaukat Ali) and Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, the Khilafat Committee launched protests. Gandhi supported Khilafat, realizing it presented a golden opportunity to unite Hindus and Muslims in a common anti-imperialist movement.


2. The Non-Cooperation Movement (1920–1922)

The Nagpur Session of INC (December 1920) officially endorsed Gandhi's Non-Cooperation resolution.

Programmes of Non-Cooperation

Boycott & Constructive Programme

Chauri Chaura Incident and Suspension of Movement

Suspension of Movement

On 5 February 1922, at Chauri Chaura (in Gorakhpur district, UP), a peaceful procession was provoked by the police. The angry mob attacked the police station and set it on fire, killing 22 policemen inside.

Distressed by the outbreak of violence, Mahatma Gandhi immediately suspended the Non-Cooperation Movement on 12 February 1922 through the Bardoli Resolution, asserting that India was not yet trained in non-violent Satyagraha.

Impact of the Non-Cooperation Movement

Significance

3. The Civil Disobedience Movement (1930–1934)

Circumstances Leading to Civil Disobedience

Preceding Events

The Dandi March (Salt Satyagraha — 1930)

Salt Satyagraha

Mahatma Gandhi chose Salt as the central symbol of defiance because salt was an essential item of food consumed by rich and poor alike, yet the British levied a heavy tax and held a government monopoly on its manufacture.

Programmes of Civil Disobedience

The Gandhi-Irwin Pact (March 1931) and Round Table Conferences

Event Key Details & Outcome
First Round Table Conference (1930) Held in London. Boycotted by the Indian National Congress; achieved no concrete progress.
Gandhi-Irwin Pact (5 March 1931) Pact between Lord Irwin and Gandhi. Congress agreed to suspend Civil Disobedience and attend 2nd RTC. Government agreed to release non-violent political prisoners and permit peaceful salt manufacture for personal consumption.
Second Round Table Conference (Sept 1931) Gandhi attended in London as sole representative of Congress. Failed because British government insisted on granting separate electorates for minorities (Depressed Classes, Muslims), which Gandhi opposed.
Resumption & End of CDM (1932–1934) Gandhi returned empty-handed and resumed Civil Disobedience in Jan 1932. Government unleashed harsh repression, outlawed Congress, and jailed top leaders. Movement gradually lost momentum and was withdrawn in May 1934.

Significance of the Civil Disobedience Movement

Historical Legacy